Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Daulat J. Ramsinghani

High Court 02 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Daulat J. Ramsinghani
Date of order
02 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Daulat J. Ramsinghani, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.08.0512:08:17+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3705 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3,Mumbai Vs.Daulat J. Ramsinghani .. Appellant .. Respondent**** Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for respondent. CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.DATE : 2[nd] AUGUST 2022 PC : 1.Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the tax effect inthe present Appeal is below the limit stipulated in terms of CircularNo. 17 of 2019, dated 08[th] August, 2019. It is stated that noinstructions have been received from the Department to withdrawthe present Appeal. 2.In the light of Circular No. 17 of 2019, the Appeal is disposedof as involving low tax effect. 3.However, we observe that in case, the Revenue fnds for somereason that the Appeal was not supposed to have been withdrawn inthe light of the Circular, it would be open to the Revenue to fle anapplication, seeking restoration of the Appeal, to be decided on itsown merits. Refund of Court-fees as per rules. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan