The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. Dsp Merrill Lynch Fund Managers Limited
High Court
21 Dec 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. Dsp Merrill Lynch Fund Managers Limited
Date of order
21 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. Dsp Merrill Lynch Fund Managers Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2025 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
DSP Merrill Lynch Fund Managers Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Counsel with Mr.Damodar i/by Kanga & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.M. Savant, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 21[st] December, 2010.
1.Counsel on both the sides state that the question raised in this appeal is squarely covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the assessee’s own case (Income Tax Appeal No.1286 of 2008) decided on 10[th] December 2008.
2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue