The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. Gujarat Ambuja Cements Limited, Mumbai
High Court
22 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. Gujarat Ambuja Cements Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
22 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
1996-1997
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. Gujarat Ambuja Cements Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATE : 22[nd] October 2012 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5988 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Gujarat Ambuja Cements Limited, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Niraj Seth with Mr.Atul K Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 22[nd] October 2012
P.C. :
1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.
2.The addition of Rs.2.14 crores was made by re-opening the assessment for assessment year 1996-1997. On appeal filed by the assessee, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that the re-opening of the assessment is bad-in-law and accordingly deleted the addition of Rs.2.14 crores. The appeal filed by the Revenue, being Income Tax Appeal No.6195
of 2010, to challenge the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal insofar as it relates to the re-opening of the assessment and consequent deletion of the addition of the amount of Rs.2.14 crores has not been entertained by this Court. Thus, on account of the re-assessment proceedings being declared invalid, the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in deleting the quantum addition have attained finality.
3.Once the quantum additions stand deleted, sustaining the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) does not survive. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.