Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. Icici Bank Limited, Mumbai

High Court 28 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. Icici Bank Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
28 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. Icici Bank Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.548 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.130 OF 2010 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6375 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai Versus ICICI Bank Limited, Mumbai ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.S.J. Mehta for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 28[th] March, 2011. 1.This Notice of Motion is taken out seeking condonation of 122 days delay in filing the Review Petition. 2.In the present case, the Review Petition is filed pursuant to the order dated 3-5-2010 passed by the Apex Court. In the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, it is stated that in view of the delay in receiving a copy of the Apex Court order dated 3-5-2010, the delay has occurred. The above explanation, in our opinion, amounts to showing sufficient cause for condoning the delay in filing the Review Petition. 3.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No costs. (Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan