The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. Icici Bank Limited, Mumbai
High Court
14 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. Icici Bank Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
14 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. Icici Bank Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2871 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6533 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai
Versus
ICICI Bank Limited, Mumbai
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.S.J. Mehta for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 28[th] March, 2011.
1.By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue