The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corpn.ltd
High Court
09 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corpn.ltd
Date of order
09 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corpn.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2823 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1039 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai).. Appellant
Versus
M/s Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corpn.Ltd.).. Respondent
Mrs Devki Iyer i/b Mr P S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr B V Jhaveri for the Respondent.
CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J.DATED: 9TH SEPTEMBER 2008.
P.C.
This Notice of Motion has been moved for condonation of 59days' delay in filing the Appeal. No reply to the Motion has been filed.In fact, there is no serious opposition. Even otherwise, we are satisfiedfrom the averments made in the affidavit in support of the Motion thatsufficient cause has been shown for condonation of delay. Keeping inview the principles stated by this Court in the case of Ornate TradersPrivate Limitred vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(2)(3), Mumbai,
-2-
Notice of Motion No.2281 of 2008 in Income Tax Appeal (Lodging)
No.1814 of 2008 and other connected matters decided on 29[th] August
2008, we condone the delay.
2.Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
3.Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly.
4.List the Appeal for admission on 30[th] September 2008.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.