The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Lazor Syntex Ltd
High Court
01 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Lazor Syntex Ltd
Date of order
01 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Lazor Syntex Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 518 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai
).. Appellant
Versus
M/s Lazor Syntex Ltd.
.).. Respondent
Mr Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.Mr J D Mistri with Mr P C Tripathi & Mr Raj Darale for theRespondent.
CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J.DATED: 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008.
P.C.
It is fairly stated that the proposed question of law sought tobe raised in the present Appeal is squarely answered on facts by thejudgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of CIT vsVeekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., 249 ITR 597 and thus no question oflaw much less substantial question of law arises for determination.Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
-2-
A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue