The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Rama Capital & Fiscal Services Ltd
High Court
26 Nov 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Rama Capital & Fiscal Services Ltd
Date of order
26 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Rama Capital & Fiscal Services Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2506 OF 2008IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4279 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1543 OF 2010
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2507 OF 2008
INNOTICE OF MOTION NO.4664 OF 2007
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1544 OF 2010
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2509 OF 2008 INNOTICE OF MOTION NO.4662 OF2007 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1544 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai.v.M/s. Rama Capital & Fiscal Services Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. A. R. Malhotra for the Appellant.
Mr. J.D.Mistri with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 26TH NOVEMBER, 2012
PC:
These Notices of motion are taken out seeking
condonation of delay of 116 days in paying the costs as per the order passed by this Court on 28/3/2008 and for restoration of the appeals which were dismissed for non payment of costs within the stipulated time. Similar notice of motion taken out by the revenue in the assessee's own case being Notice of Motion No.2508 of 2008 has been dismissed by this Court on 2/4/2009. Admittedly, the revenue has accepted the said decision dated 2/4/2009. In view of the same set of facts between these Notices of Motion and the earlier Notice of Motion, we see no reason to take a contrary view. Accordingly, all the three notice of motions are dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKELCHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.