The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Taj Trade And Investment Ltd., Mumbai 400 005
High Court
13 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Taj Trade And Investment Ltd., Mumbai 400 005
Date of order
13 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Taj Trade And Investment Ltd., Mumbai 400 005, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2 2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 134 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3,Mumbai
v/sM/s Taj Trade and Investment Ltd., Mumbai 400 005
… Appellant
… Respondent
Mr Arvind Pinto for Appellant. None for Respondent.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA AND B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ.
DATE : 13[th] JANUARY, 2016
P.C.:-
1.This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 1986-87. Mr Pinto, learned counsel for the Revenue states that the tax effect involved in the present appeal as indicated in para 11 of the Appeal Memo is Rs.1,38,906/-. He further states that in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15 dated 10[th] December 2015, the tax effect being less than the threshold limits provided therein for challenging an order of the Tribunal before this Court, he does not press the present appeal.
2
2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.