Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Vark Properties Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Vark Properties Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Vark Properties Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: V/sCommissioner of Income Tax,reported in [2007] 289 ITR 83 (SC).Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3,Mumbai..............Appellant. VersusM/s. Vark Properties Pvt. Ltd.. ........Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr. P. S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr. Atul Jasani with Mr. P. C. Tripathi for the Respondent. CORAM :BILAL NAZKIandA. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED :22ND JULY, 2008. P.C.: It is submitted that the questions framed in this appeal are covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. V/sCommissioner of Income Tax,reported in [2007] 289 ITR 83 (SC).Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan