The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.damani Estate & Finance P.ltd
High Court
24 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.damani Estate & Finance P.ltd
Date of order
24 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.damani Estate & Finance P.ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3For the reasons stated therein the present Appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2720 OF 2010
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4936 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai )..AppellantsVs.
M/s.Damani Estate & Finance P.Ltd.,----
)..Respondents
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellants.
Mr.Jignesh R. Shah with Mr.P.C.Tripathi for the respondents.----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 24/1/2011.
PC
1By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause-(a). Notice of Motion disposed off accordingly.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4936 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai )..AppellantsVs.
M/s.Damani Estate & Finance P.Ltd.,----
)..Respondents
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellants.
Mr.Jignesh R. Shah with Mr.P.C.Tripathi for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 24/1/2011.
PC
1Not on board. Taken up by consent of parties.
2Counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this
Appeal is answered against the Revenue by the decision of this
Court in the case of CIT Vs.M/s.Maheshwari Equity Brokers Pvt. Ltd., in Income Tax Appeal No.4294 of 2009 decided on 10/1/2011.
3For the reasons stated therein the present Appeal is also dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue