The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.dr.beck & Co.(India) Ltd
High Court
19 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.dr.beck & Co.(India) Ltd
Date of order
19 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.dr.beck & Co.(India) Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 528 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3,Mumbai.
vs.
M/s.Dr.Beck & Co.(India) Ltd.
Appellant
Respondent
Mr.R.Asokan i/b. Mr.T.C. Kaushik for the appellant.
Ms.Arati Sathe for the respondent.
P.C.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 19th October 2004
The controversy raised in this appeal standsconcluded by the Division Bench judgment of this Court
in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax v. Sudarshan
Chemicals Industries Ltd. & ors., 245 ITR 769.
2. However, the learned counsel for the revenue submitsthat the said judgment is under challenge before theSupreme Court. Even if that be so, in so far as we areconcerned, the controversy stands concluded by the
Division Bench judgement of this Court and, therefore,
the appeal does not deserve to be entertained.
3. No substantial question of law arises.
4. Dismissed in limine.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue