Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.ford Credit Kotak Mahindra Ltd., Mumbai

High Court 26 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.ford Credit Kotak Mahindra Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
26 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.ford Credit Kotak Mahindra Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1781 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusM/s.Ford Credit Kotak Mahindra Ltd., Mumbai..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.F.V. Irani with Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 26[th] JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-assessee. Registry is directed to register the appeal. Objections, if any are over-ruled. 2.During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the revenue fairly agreed to the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent – assessee, that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Star India Private Limited V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise. [2006] 280 ITR 321 (SC), wherein identical question on the identical provision was considered and the Supreme Court was pleased to hold that if the legislation is brought on the statute with retrospective effect, then the liability to pay interest cannot arise retrospectively since such a liability would be in the nature of punishment. In this view of the matter, we see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan