Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S.janhvi Properties Private Limited

High Court 20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S.janhvi Properties Private Limited
Date of order
20 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S.janhvi Properties Private Limited, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1784 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Janhvi Properties Private Limited..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 20[th] July, 2011. 1.In the present case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed the claim of the assessee by following its decision in assessment year 1998-99. Admittedly, the decision of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case for assessment year 1998-99 has been accepted by the Revenue. No case is made out for taking a contrary view. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.A. Sayed, J.)(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan