The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.piem Hotels Limited
High Court
01 Dec 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.piem Hotels Limited
Date of order
01 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.piem Hotels Limited, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2475 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5140 OF 2010
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2476 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4568 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.Piem Hotels Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
None for the appellant.Mr.Ajit Shah with Mr.Shrihari Iyer for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 1[st] December 2011
P.C. :
1.None for the appellant. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in
support of the Notices of Motion, both the Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). No costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue