Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.reliance Industrial Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai

High Court 30 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.reliance Industrial Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
30 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.reliance Industrial Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2510 OF 2012 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.18 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.P.C. Tripathi i/by Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 30[th] January 2013 P.C. : 1.Mr.Tripathi appearing for the respondent strongly opposes the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal by the Revenue. 2.Though the explanation stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion is not satisfactory, yet considering the fact that the stakes involved in this appeal are approximately Rs.1 crore, it would be in the interest of justice that the delay is condoned and the appeal is taken on record. However, this condonation of delay is subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- by the Revenue to the respondent – assessee. This payment to be made within a period of two weeks from today, failing which the Notice of Motion shall stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court. 3.The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan