Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.su-Raj Diamond & Jewellery Limited

High Court 04 Aug 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.su-Raj Diamond & Jewellery Limited
Date of order
04 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.su-Raj Diamond & Jewellery Limited, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Issue: 1.This appeal was admitted on 22[nd] June 2009 on the following substantial question of law. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the order of CIT (A) in holding that 90% of net interest and not gross interest will be eligible fo...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1317 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Su-Raj Diamond & Jewellery Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 4[th] August, 2011. 1.This appeal was admitted on 22[nd] June 2009 on the following substantial question of law. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the order of CIT (A) in holding that 90% of net interest and not gross interest will be eligible for deducting from the business profit while calculating deduction u/s. 80HHC of the Income Tax Act ?” 2.Counsel for the parties state that the question of law is already answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Asian Star Company Limited reported in (2010) 326 ITR 56 (Bom). In this view of the matter, the appeal is disposed off by answering the question in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. No costs. (A.A. Sayed, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan