Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3, Mumbai...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.suraj Diamonds (India)Ltd

High Court 28 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

28 Sep 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.suraj Diamonds (India)Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 59 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income-tax-3,Mumbai.vs. M/s.Suraj Diamonds (India)Ltd. Mr.R.V.Desai i/b. Mr.T.C.Kaushik for the appellant. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 28th September 2004 P.C. Heard Mr.R.V.Desai, the learned senior counsel for the revenue. 2. We perused the order of the Tribunal and we do not find any legal infirmity therein. 3. No substantial question of law arises. 4. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (R.M. LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) AppellantRespondent

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.