Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.tridhara Investments Pvt. Limited

High Court 04 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.tridhara Investments Pvt. Limited
Date of order
04 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai v. M/S.tridhara Investments Pvt. Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: 3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4045 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Tridhara Investments Pvt. Limited..Respondent. Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the appellant.Mr.J.D. Mistri, Senior Advocate with Mr.P.C. Tripathi i/by Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 4[th] August, 2011. 1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The dispute in the present case was whether the income from property which was leased out on leave and licence basis was liable to be treated as ‘business income’ or ‘income from house property’. Merely because claim made by the assessee has been rejected, it could not be said that the assessee had concealed any particulars or furnished inaccurate particulars, so as to levy penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had deleted the penalty. No fault can be found with the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan