The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. Rallis India Limited
High Court
05 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. Rallis India Limited
Date of order
05 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. Rallis India Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2160 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Rallis India Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate with Mr.P.C. Tripathi for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 5[th] July, 2011.
1.The learned Counsel for the parties state that the questions raised in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the assessee's own case reported in [2010] 323 ITR 54 (Bom) {Rallis India Limited V/s. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax}.
2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue