The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 ....Mumbai v. Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd
High Court
30 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 ....Mumbai v. Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd
Date of order
30 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 ....Mumbai v. Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3606 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income-Tax-3 ....Mumbai
Appellant.
Vs.
Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd. ....Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistri, Senior counsel with Mr. P.C. Tripathi, Advocates for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR ANDSMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2011.
P.C.
Counsel for the parties state that similar questions raised in the assesse s own case being Tax Appeal No.2329 of 2010 have been dismissed’by this Court on 17[th] June 2011. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed.
( SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue