The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Thane v. M/S.ahura Associates
High Court
11 Jan 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Thane v. M/S.ahura Associates
Date of order
11 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3, Thane v. M/S.ahura Associates, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1280 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Thane..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Ahura Associates..Respondent.
MrP.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.Firoze Andhyarujina with Mr.Paras S. Savla for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 11[th] January, 2011.
1.This appeal was admitted on 6[th] August 2009 on the following
substantial question of law.
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was correct in allowing the grounds raised by the Assessee following the order of the Tribunal in Assessee’s own case which is not consistent with provision of Section 80IA (9) of the Income Tax Act ?”
2.Learned counsel on both the sides state that the aforesaid
question of law has already been answered by this Court in the case of
Associated Capsules Private Limited V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
(Income Tax Appeal No.3036 of 2010) decided on 10th January 2011 in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
3.The Appeal is disposed off accordingly with a direction to the
Tribunal to re-compute the deduction in the light of aforesaid decision of this Court. No order as to costs.
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.