Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Al-K...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Al-Kabeer Exports Ltd

High Court 29 Jun 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Al-Kabeer Exports Ltd
Date of order
29 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Al-Kabeer Exports Ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: We set aside the impugned order of the Tribunal and remand the proceedings back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh orders in the light of the judgment delivered by this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colours (supra).

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1821 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 Vs. ..Appellant. Al-Kabeer Exports Ltd...Respondent. .... Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr. Balasaheb G. Yewale i/b Rajesh Shah & Co. for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. 29 June 2010. P.C. : The questions of law which are raised by the Revenue in this appeal are covered by the judgment of this Court rendered today in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals (ITA(L) 2887 of 2009) in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. In the circumstances, we dispose of the appeal in terms of the judgment rendered in that case. We set aside the impugned order of the Tribunal and remand the proceedings back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh orders in the light of the judgment delivered by this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colours (supra). There shall be no order as to costs. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan