In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S. Aipita Marketing Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.940 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3: Appellant
v/s
M/s. Aipita Marketing Pvt.Ltd. : Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta for AppellantMr. R. Murlidhar i/b R.R. Matkar for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 18.9.2008
P.C..Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the learned counsel for the respondent.
.We have perused order passed by this court on25.7.2008 in Income Tax Appeal no. 188 of 2008 incase of The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 vs M/s.Aipita Marketing Pvt. Ltd. In view of the same forthe same reason the present appeal also standsdismissed.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue