Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S. Dbs Corporation Services Pvt. Ltd. )........ Respondant

High Court 23 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S. Dbs Corporation Services Pvt. Ltd. )........ Respondant
Date of order
23 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S. Dbs Corporation Services Pvt. Ltd. )........ Respondant, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2821 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 527 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 .......Appellant versus M/s. DBS Corporation Services Pvt. Ltd. )........ Respondant. Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant Mr. A.K. Jasani a/w. P.C. Tripathi & Ms. Vandana Rawale forrespondent. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C.: 1.The respondent has been served. 2.The present Notice of Motion is filed for condonation ofdelay in filing the Appeal. Sufficient reasons have been given inthe affidacit in support of the Notice of Motion. Moreover, inview of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in thecase of Ornate Traders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. I. T. O. Mumbai, Notice ofMotion No.2281 of 2008 along with other connected mattersdecided on 29[th] August 2008, delay is condoned. Notice ofMotion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 3.Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly. 2.List the Appeal for hearing on admission on 11[th]November 2008. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan