The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Elpro International Ltd
High Court
29 Sep 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Elpro International Ltd
Date of order
29 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Elpro International Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: In this view of the matter, as no specific questions of law are involved, Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
- 1 -
rng
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1219 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-Tax-3 ... Appellant
vs
M/s Elpro International Ltd . Respondent
..
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i.b.Mr.Vimal Gupta for AppellantMr.Sanjiv.M.Shah for Respondent.
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Following questions of law in the appeal are involved:
(i)Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble ITAT was right in confirming the decision of CIT (A) holding that the sale of design, drawings, and intellectual property rights pertaining to assessee’s business of manufacturing and selling x-ray machines/equipments was sale of capital asset and the receipt of Rs.1,92,00,000/- the sale proceeds thereof, cannot be charged to capital gain tax ?
(ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble ITAT was right in
confirming the decision of CIT (A) holding that the assessee’s receipt of non-compete fee of
Rs.1,87,98,000/- was a capital receipt and was not chargeable to tax since no cost of its acquisition could be determined ?
2.In so far as question no.1 is concerned, the same is covered by the circular by the CBDT and that of the Delhi High Court with which we concur.
3.In so for as question no. 2 is concerned, the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXvs. BEST & CO. (P) LTD (1966) 60 ITR 11 (SC). In this view of the matter, as no specific questions of law are involved, Appeal is dismissed.
R.V.More, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.