Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S Shangrila Investment Andtrading Co. Pvt. Ltd

High Court 02 May 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S Shangrila Investment Andtrading Co. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
02 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S Shangrila Investment Andtrading Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 / 2 902-ITXA-1200-09.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1200 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 .... Appellant versus M/s Shangrila Investment andTrading Co. Pvt. Ltd.... Respondent ….... •Mr.Sham Walve, Advocate for Appellant. Mr.P.C. Tripathi, Advocate for Respondent.Mr.P.C. Tripathi, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.DATE: 02[nd] MAY, 2019. P.C. : 1. This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 (“the Act” for short) has been filed challenging theorder passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2.The learned Counsel appearing in support of the Appeal, states that he has been instructed to withdraw thisappeal. This is for the reason that the tax effect involved in this 2 / 2 902-ITXA-1200-09.odt appeal is less than the threshold limit of Rs.50 Lacs as providedin CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018. 3.In view of the above submission, the appeal isdismissed as not pressed. 4.Refund of court fees as per rules. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan