Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S. Vasishtha Tradecom Ltd. )........ Respondant

High Court 16 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S. Vasishtha Tradecom Ltd. )........ Respondant
Date of order
16 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S. Vasishtha Tradecom Ltd. )........ Respondant, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 301 OF 2004ALONGWITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income tax-3 ).......Appellant versus M/s. Vasishtha Tradecom Ltd. )........ Respondant. Mr. Vimal Gupta i/b Mr. S.S. Sarkar for the Appellant Mr. J.D. Mistry i/b Mr. Raj Darak for the Respondents. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 16TH JULY 2008. P.C.: 1.The point involved in the present appeal is covered bythe decision of a Division Bench of this court in the case ofCommissioner of Income tax Vs. Lazor Syntex Limited in IncomeTax Application No. 11 of 1999 decided on 11[th] June 2007. Wehave no reason to take any contrary view. The present appealdoes not involve any question of law much less any substantialquestion of law. Hence appeal is dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan