Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.akshya Textiles Trading

High Court 23 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.akshya Textiles Trading
Date of order
23 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.akshya Textiles Trading, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.552 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax-3..Appellant Vs. M/s.Akshya Textiles Trading & Agencies Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr. Raj Darak for the Respondent CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 23RD JANUARY,2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. P.C.: P.C.: . Appeal has been preferred on the following question:- "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal is right in directing to recomputed the assesses income by allowing the interest on borrowing utilized for purchase of shares to be held as stock in trade as business expenditure u/s.36(1)(iiii) and allow deduction u/s.80M on the gross dividend." consideration of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Emrald Co. Ltd., (2006) 284 ITR 586 (-2-) (Bom.). Considering the judgment of this Court in Emrald Co. Ltd. (supra) the question as framed would not arise. Consequently Appeal dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan