The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.akshya Textiles Trading
High Court
23 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.akshya Textiles Trading
Date of order
23 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.akshya Textiles Trading, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.552 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-tax-3..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Akshya Textiles Trading &
Agencies Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the
Appellant
Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr. Raj Darak for the Respondent
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 23RD JANUARY,2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Appeal has been preferred on the following
question:-
"(i) Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case and in law,
the Hon’ble Tribunal is right in directing to
recomputed the assesses income by allowing
the interest on borrowing utilized for
purchase of shares to be held as stock in
trade as business expenditure
u/s.36(1)(iiii) and allow deduction u/s.80M
on the gross dividend."
consideration of this Court in Commissioner of
Income Tax v. Emrald Co. Ltd., (2006) 284 ITR 586
(-2-)
(Bom.). Considering the judgment of this Court in
Emrald Co. Ltd. (supra) the question as framed
would not arise. Consequently Appeal dismissed.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.