The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S.hawkins Cookers Ltd
High Court
02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S.hawkins Cookers Ltd
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S.hawkins Cookers Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1947 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1947 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Hawkins Cookers Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.Arun Sathe, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mandar Vaidy for the
Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this Appeal in view of the decision of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The CIT V/s.Lakshmi
The CIT V/s.Lakshmi
Machine Works - (2007) 290 ITR 667 (SC),
Machine Works - (2007) 290 ITR 667 (SC), against the
revenue. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn
and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be
refunded to the Appellant as per Rules.
2. In view of dismissal of Appeal itself, nothing
further survives in the Notice of Motion No.3330/2007.
Hence, the Notice of Motion No.3330/2007 also stands
dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.