The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.sandoz Textiles & Trading
High Court
17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.sandoz Textiles & Trading
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.sandoz Textiles & Trading, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2862 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1281 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-tax-3.. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Sandoz Textiles & Trading
Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant
Mr.T.D.Mistry i/b Mr.Raj Parab for the respondent
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008
DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 588 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal.
2. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the
Notice of Motion. It appears that though the last
2
date for filing the Appeal was 04.10 05 and the
Commissioner of Income Tax had granted approval for
filing an Appeal on 7.6.05, the Appeal came to be
filed belatedly on 12.6.07 i.e. after a lapse of
almost 2 years.
3. We are not satisfied with the reasons given
for condonation of delay. The reason given for
delay is that of getting the draft memo of Appeal
prepared which does not appear to be justifiable.
No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of
delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
4. In view of the dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1281 of 2007
also stands dismissed.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.