Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S.shangrila Inv.& Trading Co.pvt.ltd

High Court 02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S.shangrila Inv.& Trading Co.pvt.ltd
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S.shangrila Inv.& Trading Co.pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.402 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.402 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Shangrila Inv.& Trading Co.Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr.Raj Darak for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2nd April, 2008 DATE : 2nd April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. By consent the Appeal is taken up for hearing. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant-revenue and the learned Counsel for the Respondent-assessee. The learned Counsel for the Appellant-revenue has pointed out that on the very same issue (as is involved in this Appeal), this Court by an order dated 11th June, 2007 passed in the Income Tax Application No.11/1999 has held that there was no substantial question of law involved in the case. Hence, for the same reasons as stated in our order dated 11th June, 2007 passed in the Income Tax Application No.11/1999, the present Appeal (L) No.402/2005 also stands dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan