The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S.suraj Diamonds (India) Ltd
High Court
08 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S.suraj Diamonds (India) Ltd
Date of order
08 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S.suraj Diamonds (India) Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.273 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3....Appellant
vs.
M/s.Suraj Diamonds (India) Ltd. ...Respondent.
---
Mr.Vimal Gupta, for appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani, for Respondent.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 8[th] August, 2008.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for boththe sides. It is clear from the order of the tribunalthat the Revenue had accepted before the Tribunalthat the question is covered by the judgment of theDivision Bench of this Court in the case
“Commissioner of Income tax Vs. Punit CommercialLtd., 245 ITR 550”. In view of this, in our opinion,the appeal cannot be entertained. Hence, it isrejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue