The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.warstila Diesel (I) Ltd
High Court
19 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.warstila Diesel (I) Ltd
Date of order
19 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S.warstila Diesel (I) Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, the Appeal is dismissed. [J.P.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1149 OF 2008withNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1987 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-3..Appellantvs.M/s.Warstila Diesel (I) Ltd... Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant
Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.A.K. Jasani for Respondent
P.C.:
1.Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The present Appeal is delayed by 430 days. The Appeal is directed against the order of the Tribunal, which is common for the Assessment Years 1992-93, 1993-94, 1995-96, 1996-97 and 1997-98. Barring the present Appeal, all Appeals, which were delayed by 430 days, were dismissed by this Court vide order dated 31st March 2009 passed in Notice of Motion No.1020 of 2009 and Notice of Motion No.1021 of 2009. Similarly Notice of Motion No.1019 of 2009 has also been dismissed for the detailed reasons recorded
therein. For the same reasons, the present Notice of Motion is also dismissed. Consequently, the Appeal is dismissed.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]
[V.C. DAGA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.