Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3Mumbai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3Mumbai v. M/S. Icici Bank Ltd.mumbai

High Court 16 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3Mumbai v. M/S. Icici Bank Ltd.mumbai
Date of order
16 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3Mumbai v. M/S. Icici Bank Ltd.mumbai, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6233 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3Mumbai..Appellant versus M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd.Mumbai ..Respondent -------- Mr. Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate i/b Ms. Padma Diwakar for the Appellant. Ms. Aarti Vissanji for the Respondent. ............. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 16[th] October, 2012 P.C. : 1This appeal arises out of the order passed by the Assessing Officer while giving effect to the order of the CIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is not in dispute that the order passed by the CIT under Section 263 was set aside by the ITAT and the appeal filed by the Revenue against the said decision was also dismissed by this court on 08.02.2012. In this view of the matter, where the order passed by the CIT under Section 263 is quashed, the question of sustaining the assessment order based on the order of CIT under Section 263 does not arise at all. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan