Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3Mumbai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Rayon & Industries Ltd

High Court 25 Mar 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Mar 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Rayon & Industries Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1238 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3Mumbai ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Indian Rayon & Industries Ltd. ..Respondent. ..... Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr. Neeraj Sheth i/b Dave & Girish & Co. for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. P.C. : 25[th] March, 2010. The registry is directed to register the appeal and the office objections are waived. Upon the appeal being restored, by consent it has been taken on Board for admission and was called out for hearing. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue has stated that in view of the order which has been passed by this Court in ITA(L) No.1239 of 2008, the present appeal is rendered infructuous. The appeal is dismissed as such. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.