The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. Active Finstock Pvt. Ltd
High Court
10 Oct 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. Active Finstock Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
10 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. Active Finstock Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.Refund of court fees, if any, as per rules. [ VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. ] [ DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J. ]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.9 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai Vs.Active Finstock Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.J.DATE : 10TH OCTOBER, 2022.
P.C. :
1.Since the tax effect in the present Appeal is less than Rs.1 crore,Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdrawthis Appeal in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8th August 2019.
2.Accordingly, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.Refund of court fees, if any, as per rules.
[ VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. ]
[ DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J. ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue