In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. Darashaw And Company Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5571 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
Darashaw and Company Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Ms.Shabnam Shaikh i/by Khaitan & Company for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 13[th] October 2011
1.Counsel for the parties state that similar questions raised in the assessee’s own case, being Income Tax Appeal No.2620 of 2010 has already been dismissed by this Court on 22[nd] July 2011.
2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also
dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. Tated, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue