The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. Jashan Textile Mills Limited
High Court
11 Jan 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. Jashan Textile Mills Limited
Date of order
11 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. Jashan Textile Mills Limited, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.671 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Jashan Textile Mills Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 11[th] January, 2011.
1.This appeal was admitted on 16[th] June 2009 on the following
substantial question of law.
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was right in holding that deduction allowed to the Assessee Company under Section 80IA should not be reduced from the deduction allowable to the Assessee Company under Section 80HHC of the Act even though the provisions of Section 80IA(9) of the Act specifically states that where deduction under Section 80IA has been claimed and allowed for any assessment year, deduction to the extent of such profits / gains shall not be allowed under Section 80HH to 80RRA of the Act ?
2.Learned counsel on both the sides state that the aforesaid
question of law has already been answered by this Court in the case of Associated Capsules Private Limited V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
(Income Tax Appeal No.3036 of 2010) decided on 10th January 2011 in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
3.The Appeal is disposed off accordingly with a direction to the Tribunal to re-compute the deduction in the light of aforesaid decision of this Court. No order as to costs.
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.