The Commissioner Of Income-Tax –4, Mumbai v. M/S Enam Securities Pvt Ltd
High Court
02 Dec 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax –4, Mumbai v. M/S Enam Securities Pvt Ltd
Date of order
02 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax –4, Mumbai v. M/S Enam Securities Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 13 of 2011.
The Commissioner of Income-tax –4, Mumbai
... Appellant.
Versus
M/s Enam Securities Pvt Ltd.
... Respondent.
Mr Suresh Kumar, for the appellant.
Mr Sanjiv M. Shah, for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 2 December, 2011.
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that the similar question raised by the Revenue in the case of the Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s The Stock and Bond Trading Company being Income Tax Appeal No. 4117 of 2010, has been rejected on 14[th] October, 2011. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R.Joshi,J)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue