Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -4, Mumba...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S L.k.p. Shares & Securities Ltd

High Court 10 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S L.k.p. Shares & Securities Ltd
Date of order
10 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S L.k.p. Shares & Securities Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: P.C. :- 1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that V-SAT and data processing charges / transaction charges are not technical services falling under Section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL Lodging No. 5523 of 2010. The Commissioner of Income-tax -4, Mumbai ... Appellant. Versus M/s L.K.P. Shares & Securities Ltd. ... Respondent. Mr Vimal Gupta for the appellant. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 10 January,2012. P.C. :- 1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that V-SAT and data processing charges / transaction charges are not technical services falling under Section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The assessment year involved herein is 2005-2006. 3.This Court in the case of in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 475 of 2011 (Income Tax Commissioner, Mumbai Vs. Angel Capital & Debit Market Ltd) Ladda decided on 28[th] July, 2011 has held that V-SAT charges paid by the assessee to the Stock Exchange are not covered under Section 194J of the Act. Accordingly, decision of the ITAT in holding that the payments made on account of V-SAT charges are not technical services cannot be faulted. 4.As regards the data processing charges/transaction charges is concerned, this Court in the case of CIT vs. M/s Kotak Securities Ltd. being Income-tax Appeal No.3111 of 2009 decided on 21[st] October, 2011 has held that the transaction charges are technical services falling under Section 194J of the Act, however, no disallowance could be made under Section 40 (a) and (ia) of the Act in the assessment year 2005-06. 5.In the light of the aforesaid judgment and order in the case of CIT vs. M/s Kotak Securities Ltd (cited supra), the question raised in this appeal cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.R.Joshi,J) (J.P.Devadhar,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan