The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S Puneet Securities Pvt. Ltd
High Court
10 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S Puneet Securities Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
10 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S Puneet Securities Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL Lodging No. 6429 of 2010.
The Commissioner of Income-tax -4, Mumbai
... Appellant.
Versus
M/s Puneet Securities Pvt. Ltd.
... Respondent.
Mr Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 10 January,2012.
P.C. :-
1.The questions of law raised in this appeal read thus :
(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that transaction charges paid to the Stock Exchange by the Assessee company were not paid in consideration of technical services rendered by the Stock Exchange within the meaning of Section 194J read with Explanation 2 to Section 9 (1) (vii) of the Income-tax Act?
(b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that V-SAT charges and Leaseline
Ladda
charges paid to the Stock Exchange by the Assessee Company were not paid in consideration of technical services rendered by the Stock Exchange within the meaning of Section 194J read with Explanation 2 to section 9 (1) (vii) of the Income-tax Act?
2.The assessment year involved herein is 2005-2006.
3.Counsel for the Revenue states that the similar questions raised by the Revenue in the case of the CIT vs. L.K.P.Shares & Securities Ltd being Income Tax Appeal No. 5523 of 2010, has been rejected on 10[th] January, 2011. In this view of the matter, the questions raised in this appeal cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R.Joshi,J)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.