The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4, Mumbai v. M/S.mega Fine Pharma Private Limited
High Court
22 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4, Mumbai v. M/S.mega Fine Pharma Private Limited
Date of order
22 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4, Mumbai v. M/S.mega Fine Pharma Private Limited, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5618 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 4, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.Mega Fine Pharma Private Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 22[nd] March, 2011.
1.This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 7-5-2010 in Income Tax Appeal No.5673/Mum/2006 relating to assessment year 2003-2004. Perusal of the order of the Tribunal shows that in respect of the question which is subject matter of the present appeal, the issue is restored to the file of the assessing officer with a direction to follow the Special Bench decision in the case of Topman Exports reported in 318 ITR 87 (AT)(SB).
The Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of Topman
Exports has been over-ruled by this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kalpataru Colors and Chemicals reported in 328 ITR 451.
3.In this view of the matter, since the Tribunal has restored the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. However, the Assessing Officer while giving effect to the order of the Tribunal, shall take into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colors and Chemicals (supra).
4.The appeal is accordingly disposed off with no order as to costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.