The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. M/S.padmakshi Financial Services Private Limited
High Court
25 Nov 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. M/S.padmakshi Financial Services Private Limited
Date of order
25 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. M/S.padmakshi Financial Services Private Limited, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.957 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Padmakshi Financial Services Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar i/by Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.Jitendra Jain i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 25[th] November 2011
P.C. :
1.Counsel for the parties state that since part of the question raised in this appeal is covered in favour of the assessee and partly in favour of the Revenue, it would be in the interest of justice to remand the matter back to the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for fresh consideration in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kotak Secutiries Limited, being Income Tax Appeal No.3111 of 2009 decided on 21[st] October 2011.
2.Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the questions raised in this appeal are restored to the file of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal for fresh consideration in the light of the judgment of this Court in
Kotak Securities Limited (Supra).
3.The appeal is accordingly disposed off with no order as to costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.