The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. Pashupati Capital Services Private Limited

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.960 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus Pashupati Capital Services Private Limited..Respondent. None for the appellant.Ms.Kadambari Surve i/by Mr.Pankaj R Toprani for the respondent. P.C. : CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 3[rd] February 2012 1.It is brought to our notice that in our order dated 17[th] January 2012, the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kotak Securities Limited in Income Tax Appeal No.3111 of 2009 decided on 21[st] October 2011 had remained to be incorporated in para-2 of the order. 2.Accordingly, the registry is directed to carry out the necessary corrections. After corrections, para-2 of the order dated 17[th] January 2012, reads thus : “Counsel for the parties state that the question of law raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Angel Capital and Debit Market Limited, being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.475 of 2011 decided on 28[th] July 2011 and the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kotak Securities Limited in Income Tax Appeal No.3111 of 2009 decided on 21[st] October 2011.” 3.Order accordingly. (A.R. Joshi, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)