Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. Satco Securities & Financial Services Limited, Mumbai

High Court 25 Sep 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. Satco Securities & Financial Services Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
25 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai v. Satco Securities & Financial Services Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: 5.So far as question No.(b) is concerned, the Appeal is Admit. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that depreciation u/s.32 of the Income Tax Act is allowable on the membership card of the Stock Exchange ?

Decision: 7.The appeal is accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1820 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus Satco Securities & Financial Services Limited, Mumbai..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Ms.Preeti Shukla i/by Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. 2.So far as question Nos.(a) is concerned, the same is covered by the Judgment of this Court in I ncome Tax Appeal No.114 of 2009 decided on 9/2/2009 in the case of Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) V/s. M/s.OmanInternational Bank SAOG (unreported). 3.So far as question No.(d) is concerned, the same is covered by the Judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. WMI Cranes Limited in Income TaxAppeal no.1155 of 2007 decided on 9-10-2007. 4.So far as question No.(c) is concerned, Appeal having identical question is dismissed by this Court. 5.So far as question No.(b) is concerned, the Appeal is Admit. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that depreciation u/s.32 of the Income Tax Act is allowable on the membership card of the Stock Exchange ? 6.Having heard both the counsel for the parties, appeal is allowed for the reasons recorded in the Division Bench Judgment of this court in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.971 of 2006 [ CIT V/s. M/s.Techno Shares & Stocks Limited] decidedon 11-9-2009since the question sought to be raised relate to the depreciation with regard to BSE membership card. The question is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. 7.The appeal is accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan