The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S Dhayabhai Share & Stock Brokers Ltd
High Court
18 Feb 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S Dhayabhai Share & Stock Brokers Ltd
Date of order
18 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S Dhayabhai Share & Stock Brokers Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.41 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4 ..Appellant
-versus
M/s Dhayabhai Share & Stock Brokers Ltd .. Respondents
Mr.Vimal Gupta, for the appellantMr V.Mannadiar, for respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 18[th] February,2009
P.C.1. Revenue is in appeal against the order ofIT, allowing bad debts for the assessment yearl999-2000. CIT(A), confirmed the order of IT. IT(AO), initially in the case MS Kamal D Bhavani,had taken a view that as there was no bad debt,non existence of bad debt could not be written inthe books of account. On appeal before CIT(A), onthe contention advanced in the matter OFarbitration proceeding, the matter was referredback to A.O. The A.O has in the report admittedthe arbitration proceeding in respect of whichaward was made by the Arbitrator. Butsubsequently before in the High Court that awardwas set aside. Considering this factual finding,the bad debt was allowed.
2. In so far as M/s Padmalaya TirupatiSecurities Pvt Ltd, it was noted that there wasresolution of the Board of Directors to treat the
bad debt. On these two concurrent findings onfacts and in the above light appeal would notlie. Consequently appeal dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J) (F.I.REBELLO, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.