The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. Mss Securities Private Limited
High Court
29 Sep 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. Mss Securities Private Limited
Date of order
29 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. Mss Securities Private Limited, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Having heard learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue, appeal is allowed for the reasons recorded in our judgment in the case of C.I.T.vs.Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.971 of 2006 decided by this Court on 11th September, 2009.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
rng
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (lod) No.2138 of 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4
.. Appellant
vs
M/s. MSS Securities Private Limited .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i.b.Mr.Ram Upadhyay for AppellantNone for Respondent
CORAM: V.C.DAGA AND R.V.MORE,JJ
DATED: September 29, 2009
P.C.
Heard. Office objections are overruled. Office to register the appeal. Appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of the appellant.
Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the
case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal was justified in law in allowing depreciation on card of Bombay Stock Exchange ?
2.Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. Inspite of service, nobody is present on behalf of the respondent.
Affidavit of service filed is taken on record.
3.The questions of law sought to be raised in this appeal relates to depreciation on BSE card. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue, appeal is allowed for the reasons recorded in our judgment in the case of C.I.T.vs.Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.971 of 2006 decided by this Court on 11th September, 2009. Accordingly, the question is answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. NO order as to costs.
R.V.More, J
V.C.Daga, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.