Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. Mss Securities Private Limited

High Court 29 Sep 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. Mss Securities Private Limited
Date of order
29 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. Mss Securities Private Limited, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Having heard learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue, appeal is allowed for the reasons recorded in our judgment in the case of C.I.T.vs.Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.971 of 2006 decided by this Court on 11th September, 2009.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

- 1 - rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (lod) No.2138 of 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4 .. Appellant vs M/s. MSS Securities Private Limited .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i.b.Mr.Ram Upadhyay for AppellantNone for Respondent CORAM: V.C.DAGA AND R.V.MORE,JJ DATED: September 29, 2009 P.C. Heard. Office objections are overruled. Office to register the appeal. Appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of the appellant. Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal was justified in law in allowing depreciation on card of Bombay Stock Exchange ? 2.Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. Inspite of service, nobody is present on behalf of the respondent. Affidavit of service filed is taken on record. 3.The questions of law sought to be raised in this appeal relates to depreciation on BSE card. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue, appeal is allowed for the reasons recorded in our judgment in the case of C.I.T.vs.Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.971 of 2006 decided by this Court on 11th September, 2009. Accordingly, the question is answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. NO order as to costs. R.V.More, J V.C.Daga, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan