Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. S. Kumar Ltd

High Court 29 Oct 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. S. Kumar Ltd
Date of order
29 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. S. Kumar Ltd, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: P.C. : 1 The question of law raised by the revenue in this appeal read as thus: “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and law, the Tribunal erred in holding that the interest paid on borrowed funds for purchase of plant and machinery to the extent relatable to the period prior t...

Decision: 3 In this view of the matter, we see no merits in the appeal and the same is hereby disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6027 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4..Appellantversus M/s. S. Kumar Ltd. ..Respondent -------- Mr. Vimal Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Padma Divakar for the Appellant. Ms. Vasanti B. Patel for the Respondent. ............. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 29[th] October, 2012. P.C. : 1 The question of law raised by the revenue in this appeal read as thus: “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and law, the Tribunal erred in holding that the interest paid on borrowed funds for purchase of plant and machinery to the extent relatable to the period prior to the commencing of plant and machinery to be allowed as a deduction u/s. 36(1)(iii) of the Act?” 2 The Counsel for the parties state that the aforesaid question raised by the revenue stands answered against the revenue by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of DCIT V/s. Core Health Care Ltd. reported in (2008)298 ITR 194 (SC). 3 In this view of the matter, we see no merits in the appeal and the same is hereby disposed of. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan