Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S. Svs Securities P. Ltd

High Court 19 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S. Svs Securities P. Ltd
Date of order
19 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S. Svs Securities P. Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 MSS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.4101 OF 2006 IN INCOME-TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2253 OF 2006 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-4 APPELLANT Vs. M/s. SVS SECURITIES P. LTD. RESPONDENT Mrs. Poonam Bhosale for the appellant Mr. Atul K. Jasani for respondent CORAM:SMT.RANJANA DESAI & SMT. R. P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE: 19/6/08 P.C. condonation of delay. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. . For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the motion delay of 175 days is condoned 2 subject of course to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/-to the respondent within a period of twelve weeks from today. Condonation of delay will be subject to the payment of the costs of Rs.1,000/- to the respondent. . Motion is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan